Disadvantages of Using Flowable as an Embedded Workflow.
Can you please elaborate on each point mentioned.
it would be great If you can provide how its addressed in Flowabled cluster deployment
Hey @hashdhi,
The previous post was from a spam bot. We’ve deleted and blocked that account now.
Regarding your question. In my opinion there is no Embedded Workflow vs Cluster Deployment. You can use Flowable as an embedded engine in a cluster deployment or as a single deployment.
Can you perhaps clarify what you are looking for?
Hey @filiphr
Flowable as an embedded engine in a cluster deployment .
We are integrating Flowable with our Spring Boot application. Are there any disadvantages when comparing this setup with deploying the Flowable workflow engine as a dedicated cluster (i.e., not within the same application JVM process)?
Hi @hashdhi , are you trying to compare using flowable into existing spring boot application, and running flowable as a separate application?
Yes we are trying to compare using flowable into existing spring boot application, and running flowable as a separate application