wwitt
January 29, 2020, 12:26pm
4
Yes, the transaction listener should exist in the task before the receive task. It should only contain the code that actually sends the message or contacts the external process.
Here was another post with a similar issue:
In Flowable documentation:
"When the external service wants to trigger the waiting process instance again, this can be done synchronously and asynchronously. To prevent optimistic lock exceptions, the asynchronous trigger would be the best solution. By default an async job is exclusive, which means that the process instance will be locked and it’s guaranteed that no other activity on the process instance can interfere with the trigger logic.”
But we are faced with the fact that the behavior …
1 Like